I know that the lads don't proofread but.....

By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics and access other forums reserved for members. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today by clicking here.

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:05 am

I have contacted you to assist me retrieving the funds in a certain investment account of his valued at about $20,500,000.00 (Eigteen Million Five Hundred United State Dollars only) left behind by my client before they got confiscated or declared unserviceable by the Finance House where these huge deposits were lodged. Since I have been unsuccessful in locating the relatives, I now seek your consent to Npresent you as the next of kin of the deceased since you are from the same country. Upon my receipt of your positive response, we shall then
discuss the necessary modalities.

Seems they can't count either, I never really understood why they bothered to reiterate the sum in the first place, but honestly if you are going to do it do pay attention Confused

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:30 am

Quote:

modalities

but he is talking our language
Time to start stringing him along.

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:34 am

I've been dealing with a lad who all along has told me that I'll be accepting 26.5 million and even the bank in an email said the same figure while attaching a 'deposit slip' that clearly states 46.5 million. I was tempted to mention it but going to string it out for a while. I'm going to see how many different figures I can mention.

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:38 am

I'm just gonna have to see what percentage of what sum he is offering, out with your calculators. Wink

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:31 pm

Yeah, but you just try changing the sum in your email that you're offering them. The greedy little buggers are onto it like a flash.

Quote:

"you said $500 not $200 for photos".

The toe-rag.

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:42 pm

Slightlyoutofit wrote:

Yeah, but you just try changing the sum in your email that you're offering them. The greedy little buggers are onto it like a flash.

One of my lads got his "barrister" to charge me $560. When I "accidentally" reconfirmed the $5600 in charges, you could almost hear my lad hyperventilating as he was typing.

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:18 pm

^^^^ You wouldn't mind if I "steal" that modality in a future bait, would you? Laughing

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:50 pm

sent you details on pm if you want headers please let me know....

Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:56 pm

I just repsonded to your PM.

Baiting Guru Joined: 17 Sep 2006 Posts: 5905

I love it when they don't read something they send out and it contains errors, it makes my job of wasting their time easier as I don't have to create problems they are already there; some lads just bait themselves Cool

Of course you have to be careful, if they make a really simple error which could lead a real victim to the realisation they are being scammed you have to keep it zipped.

Baiting Guru Joined: 31 Jan 2007 Posts: 12237

You have it all wrong.. The number is an empirical standard. The phonetic reiteration is a metric conversion. These are international businessmen, are YOU?.

Don't you scambaiters know anything?!

edit: spelling error, I didn't proofread.

I know that the lads don't proofread but.....	View next topic View previous topic